Coming from the official Assassin's Creed Twitter account...
Tweet 1: "He is gone. #16 is no more. And now they begin. To search for 1 more"
Tweet 2: "THEY are responsible. Abstergo's to blame. They play with our lives. Like it's only a game"
Tweet 3: "They search for the ‘’prophet’’ They’re grasping at straws. Their ill-conceived plans, are riddled with flaws"
I haven't played any Assassin's Creed game past the first one, so these are lost on me. I'm sure some of you guys can figure out what all this is about.
Link
Tweet 1: "He is gone. #16 is no more. And now they begin. To search for 1 more"
Tweet 2: "THEY are responsible. Abstergo's to blame. They play with our lives. Like it's only a game"
Tweet 3: "They search for the ‘’prophet’’ They’re grasping at straws. Their ill-conceived plans, are riddled with flaws"
I haven't played any Assassin's Creed game past the first one, so these are lost on me. I'm sure some of you guys can figure out what all this is about.
Link






I don't really know what this is, but it's really catchy! ;D
For the unititated, "#16" is the test subject BEFORE Desmond (who is #17). The bad guys were rooting through his head for the memories of his ancestors first, he went nuts and died. But part of his consciousness was left behind in the Animus, and thus he was kinda helping Desmond for a bit before he finally just disappated.
Nintendo fanboys are freaking unbelievable.... So much hype for AC3 but you don't find any sense in this? You are disgusting... if you don't even know what the game is about why do you get all crazy for it? That's just stupid
@MichMasteR What's your problem?
Yep, definitely relating to the story going on outside of the historic settings (the stuff with Desmond and Abstergo). Most of the attention for the game's leading up to release obviously focus on the historical settings that it's usually not until we get closer to release we start to hear anything on the Desmond side.
Is that really necessary? I don't think it is. I haven't really played Mass Effect 2 but I am looking forward to playing 3 on Wii U. Does that make me disgusting?
Anyway, a few tweets to get me back in the mood for some more 'ssassinating! I hope I warm to Connor as quickly as I did to Ezio!
Because you have to play all of the prequels to understand the sequels. Yep. Everyone who enjoyed Super Mario Galaxy had played every canon Mario title before it. Yep. That's how gaming works.
If you are going to be a "fan" of something then avoid posting "Strange posts" "I don't have idea what does that mean", makes you look really stupid, you look forward for a game that you have no freaking idea what is about
Now you compare "Bowser kidnapping Peach, Mario saving her" to a real deep story like AC? wow.
@MichMasteR I have a 360 and i played the first one when it came out. I didn't like it so i didn't buy the sequels. I don't know why this means, it doesn't mean i'm stupid
It means you are stupid if you actually want to get the 3rd one and have no idea what the hell the story is about, you are just buying cause "oh hey! a game that has never been in a nintendo console, day one purchase!!!"
@MichMasteR
You know what else is unbelievable are ragers that make brash childish assumptions about people over the internet. Shall I make such immature assumptions as well and say you're probably just some pissed off anti-Nintendo fanboy who for some inconceivable reason desired to browse a Nintendo dedicated site and not realize that just because people love Nintendo doesn't mean they only play Nintendo.
I personally aside from my Nintendo systems also do have a gaming PC, PS3, Vita and PSP. I also have an iPad and iPhone. I've never been interested in Assassin's Creed because it took place in Rome (no offense to Italians), but am interested in this since it takes place in America. I did play a short bit of the first one because my boyfriend's brother loves anything to do with Rome. Does this mean I'm not allowed to play 3 just because I wasn't interested in it's setting?
Also stop assuming everyone who only owns a Wii are fanboys as my cousin only owns a Wii and that's because that's what my Aunt got her. She has a decent gaming PC thanks to yours truly ^.^ and has never played the first two because she doesn't like gaming on a computer. So does that mean she's not allowed to get Assassin's Creed III when it comes out (for any system though probably will be Wii U if rumors of a year gap between U and PS4 and X8 are true if they release sooner she wants a PS4 to play with me so does that mean she can't get ACIV?)?
You know what is really stupid (and childish)? Create an acc on an website just to disturb some players. Youre wasting your time with such an worthless attitude. THIS is stupid. Grow up man. I think it's better to spend your time with your games and your girlfriend (if you have one).
Yeap... classic fanboy comment.
Read the first 2 comments of this thread, tell me more about closed mind fanboys. I'm not saying that its bad to play the 3rd without the other 4 that released before, it is the fact that you are only playing since it is coming to a Nintendo console and it's hilarious how they comment how bad they want a game that they havent even played in their entire life, as I said... 2 first comments made me LOL
second comment of the thread had the answer so i don't know why that would make you "LOL".
i have some advice for you. go out and get laid. then you can come back and have an adult conversation. because that's what this is really about isn't it. its not about 'stupid nintendo fanboys' its about your inability to find a girl who willl tolerate you long enough to f**k you.
When I bought a PS3 THIS January since I admit that I was missing out on a lot of great titles being Wii only, I bought Revelations because it came with AC1. Which was very sub par and I struggled through it. The Ending though AMAZING that I jumped on 2 and Loved it and continued the Franchise. Honestly, if you're only a Nintendo Gamer, you're missing out, and will be Very Very lost in the underlining storyline of 3. Though Given the Beginning portion of Each game, they always summarize the previous games, so 3 might have a pretty lengthy intro. Would be Cool if Ubisoft Re-released all the Previous games on the Wii U as a Origins Collection, I'd double dip.
hahahaha that's the best you can do? what do girls have to do with all this, yeap, another common non-sense attack from a stupid fanboy....
so...wanting assassins creed 3 on the wiiu = stupid, but wanting assassins creed 3 on xbox 360 or ps3, regardless if you played any of the previous ones = perfectly fine.
whos the fanboy?
I don't know...I'm still not sold by AC3, the last two entries left me a very bad taste.
The first one was pretty meh, AC2 was excellent(my favorite entry and best AC so far) and brotherhood and revelations were really boring and shorts, they felt like DLC's for AC2. Also ubisoft seems to be extending the story in a very unnecesary way.
Even though AC3 seems good for now, if I buy the game I will certainly do it for the wii u, having a big map displaying in your hands all the time is really helpful, if you ever played AC before you will know that.
I did read the first two comments.. the first shows no indication that he or she only buys Nintendo systems and or plays games released on Nintendo systems? He or she could easily be like me and have other means to play the other ACs but haven't had a chance to for numerous OTHER reasons. The second commenter sounds like they've played the series and knows what the tweets seem to be discussing.. so I have no idea where you're seeing a Nintendo fanboy.. or are you talking about Gimpee's comment about the tweet because Bumper specifically said he's played only the first one and the tweets don't ring a bell as it could pertain to the other ACs. Unless those tweets are decipherable by players of the first and you're saying Bumper is lying then fine, bit I still stand in asking where do you see blind Nintendo fanboyism in the real first two comments?
Imma light a candle for you Michmaster, since you're no longer with us.
View the full discussion!