Irritating Stick wrote:@chosenoneknuckles
But it's a Japan\Europe event, so I wouldn't expect western release dates at that, unless NoA decides to do one as well...
ridleysaria wrote:If it ain't E3, I don't.... I don't..... dammit, can't think of a rhyme for that.
Jet Pilot wrote:I have no expectations therefore I cannot be disappointed. You would think that people would've figured this out by now. But no. Once again people will speculate all day and hype themselves up only to be let down by the actual presentation because it didn't meet their made-up expectations. Is like a sort of masochism that most Nintendo fans enjoy...not this one.
V3N0M wrote:ridleysaria wrote:If it ain't E3, I don't.... I don't..... dammit, can't think of a rhyme for that.
If it ain't E3, then leave me be!
motherbra1n wrote:I really don't understand the negativity behind E3 2003. Wasn't that when metroid prime 2 and resident evil 4 were announced?
ridleysaria wrote:motherbra1n wrote:I really don't understand the negativity behind E3 2003. Wasn't that when metroid prime 2 and resident evil 4 were announced?
2003 was the year where Nintendo's big focus was GC/GBA connectivity. I couldn't believe how much time they spent showing Pacman Vs. Seriously, you knew it was bad when that was their big game for the show. Prime 2 and RE4 were there but barely. The Prime 2 announcement was a 15 second clip that amounted to nothing more than a tease. RE4 wasn't playable either and it was the (underwhelming) version of the game that was completely shelved. Neither of those games had their true unveiling until E3 2004.
2003 was a pretty good year as far as released though. It was just E3 that sucked.
still sounds infinitely better than e3 2008 (I know that doesn't say much)
Users browsing this forum: OmnipotentSwine