Halo Reach or Call of Duty Black Ops?

[TheOriginalGio]

So which is better? Let the debate begin! I personally prefer Halo Reach!

[Garfitor]

Hard to say, as I've only played the beta of one of them, but as I'm picking up Reach at midnight Monday, and probably won't be buying Black Ops, I guess my vote goes to Reach. I own Modern Warfare 2, but only because a friend bought it for me as a gift, and while I get hours of enjoyment out of it, I have far less faith in Treyarch's CoD games, and in general find Activision's milking of the franchise distasteful. On the other hand, I feel that the guys at Bungie put tons of love and effort into each installment in the series, and the games are crazy packed with content. I didn't care for previous Halo games' multiplayer, but the Reach beta was awesome fun, so I think it'll be worth it for me.

[mariomaniac45213]

I have to choose Black Ops as I only own a Wii. Even then with Goldeneye 007 and Conduit 2, I might not be getting Black Ops. It all depends on which one turns out better.

[demonbaby]

Reach, even though I don't have an xbox, i play halo at my friend's house all the time, and i prefer it over call of duty.

[cortjezter]

moved this to the Polls forum, since it's not really a debate topic. if you "voted" before, please try again and feel free to post a comment if you like.

[TYFIGHTER]

Reach. The CoD franchise as a whole really has a lot of online issues they need to fix. Their spawn system is abysmal, and they just have too much stupid crap that really throws all perk and weapon balance out the window. I love the gameplay, but there are too many nagging issues that have pushed me away from the franchise.

However, CoD4 is near online FPS perfection.