You list 4 games where you killed aliens in space or on Earth...if you weren't tired of it by the second or third game, then a fifth one will not matter.
Again i did not clarify on my position on this and i will admit this is my fault again.
I dont like shooters.Im not in a position to defend the shooters i mentioned and attack the Conduit 2 because i simply didnt like some elements or the whole games.
The reason why i playied the aforementioned games is because i had seen some good premise into them or had heard good things about them.I playied Halo Reach because i had heard good things about the characters and the story which i found to be quite average really.
I playied the First Resistance game (I repeat the first one, not the second halo rip-off.) because i playied it at a friends house it aimed to be like an old school shooter in the likes of doom with some wacky weapons.
I playied Killzone 2 because i found the Helghan to be vissually and creativily facinating characters and the setting to hold my interest which resulted in a mind fuck of dissapointement and excitement.I dont have time to explain that right now but trust me i have a history with Killzone.
I know that i am overestimating what the developers are creating these days but i still hold hope that more shooters like bioshock or whatever to be created.
Most shooters just pay to much attention to be mildless entaitainment than something worthwhile that makes you think or gets you interested in a subject ( i didnt know who Ayn Rand or objectivism was before bioshock ) through not to say that only western shooters are limited to this.
Im not saying that every game should turn into like a Scott Fitzgerald or somthing like Logan's Run but not so much focus should be put on being another Gears of Duty Halo:Guns of the patriots. How about some games that explore more themes than duty or death or patritism or whatever.
My point is that the Conduit 2 doesnt try to do anything new on gameplay from what i have heard.Through i must be honest here and say that i will not be able to form a complete opinion until i playied through all of the game and understood the story.
Most FPS games are very derivative. The motion control aspect is very immersing, however, and that was one of the things I loved about both Conduit, and MW: Reflex. The fact that it's on Wii, with motion controls, is a major plus. It's great that Sony finally caught up and released motion controls...Killzone and the like should be awesome to play now. Hopefully, Nintendo can release an HD console so there is no longer any difference between any FPS game on any console. I don't even know if Microsoft expects anyone to play FPS games on Kinect...I don't see how it could be done. But, I would love to be proven wrong.
Personally i think that you got off railed here with this point.
I just made a point that the Conduit doesnt seem add anything new to the table of the Shooter genre, not that the motion controls will suck or will be pointless on it.
On the other hand dont expect the Kinect to do anything else than party games or on rail shooters good.Its like a wii except that you dont have any bottons to push and the only way to move your characters is by hand gestures.Try to play a platformer,third person shooter or an FPS with those without humiliating your self or even finishing the first level.
You know as much i would like to harp on sony for the Move looking a lot like the Wii atleast they offer a variety of games ranging from Hardcore to casual ones.Atleast they support both the PS3 and the Move offering new games for both.Atleast the damn Move looks like it will work and be precise and atleast they didnt name their Wii Sports version
Move Sports but Sports Champions.
Sorry i kinda got off point here i apologise.
Well, honestly, Halo Reach doesn't blow my mind either...neither does Resistance. Ragging on the graphics is the easiest thing to do, since it is an SD console...in motion it doesn't look bad at all. It doesn't look like Crysis, but who is really expecting anything like that?
While yes its easy to rag about the graphics (more on the on the next lines) i think you missed the "it didnt add anything new part".Im not ragging on the graphics because im a graphics Xbox/PS3 Fanboy whore, im ragging for the graphics because its the one thing that the developers wanted to get right.
They even said in an interview about the first game that they wanted "...to make a game worthy of chalenging xbox/ps3 games." even through the Wii is phenomically underpowered agaist its opponents.But it makes it up with having motion controls and a much more supporting fanbase of players and 3rd party support.
I for once hoped that those devs would realise that with the console generation slowly changing routes to motion control, that this will not be another "I managed to outbro your graphics...bro."
This is honestly coming to be the generation where companies and devs arent trying to outgansta each other with graphics and moved to trying new things with story,gameplay or motion control.
Honestly, you said you didn't like the first game...so, I don't know why you'd think you would like the second one. If graphics are your major concern, then looking to a third party developer who is working on an SD console is the wrong place to start.
1.Yeah you kinda have a point there.I dont know why im looking so much into the second game that i am willing to tear it up and new ass hole but i am kinda disappointed that the game looks like another generic shooter taking ques basecly from every modern FPS since halo.The only thing that may save this is the story and maybe the whole design of the game.
Just to be honest here i would have teared this game uppart even it was exclusivly on the PS3 or Xbox.
2.Graphics are not my major concern.AS you said if i wanted graphics i would go play a PS3 or Xbox Game.My major concern and the first thing i will junge in a game will be the story than the gameplay.The graphics unless they enchance the expiriance in any other game except trying to be realistic, will be an after thought.