


KingBroly wrote:Well, you can keep reading the information I provided a few pages back.
Then again, in regards to games, we still know nothing of what's coming other than Pikmin 3. But that really can't be the only thing Nintendo is planning for launch, is it?


Game0n wrote:I hear that the 5th and 6th versions of this development kit are pretty powerful, and Frostbite 2 has been seen running on the Wii U with very smooth results and a higher frame rate than the 360 version of Battlefield 3, that are superior to any PS3/360 game running Frostbite 2.

LegendofZelda1996 wrote:http://game0n.net/2012/02/25/dead-space ... litters-4/
Does this signify any good news for the Wii U?

ddddd wrote:Well, that cant possibly mean anything bad. Running CryEngine, Frostbite2, Unreal Engine 3, etc better than any other console is good enough as marketing hype alone. Developers would not need to rework anytying to get their games running on WiiU
NeoGAF wrote:The way I saw things (from a completely individual perspective, and considering the information I've heard over the past year):
The first dev kits were slightly more powerful than the current generation leaders - and they were the ones used to make the E3 demos.
The second revision fixed some Upad problems and added better functionality
The third to fourth revisions saw an increase in power/better efficiency, with other lsight alterations.
The fifth revision added multiple Upad support.
The sixth and seemingly final development kit saw a large and considerable increase in power, following requests from developers. This apparently meant a more capable GPU revision/tweak and a greater amount of RAM.


KingBroly wrote:I'll get out in front of this one:
http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.ph ... ount=11487
He's pretty specific about his information, but his wording is a little weird, but I assume that's because English isn't his primary language.





Serpent_Seed wrote:I've seen some 39" 1080 TV for $300. Nice but I want lower. If they get to $200 like around black Friday I'll get one or wait until next year.

Serpent_Seed wrote:Right now i have a 19". The most I want to spend for a new TV is $250. I really am looking for around 40". I feel that's big enough. Of course one day I'll go even bigger. But around 40" is what I'm aiming for now.

KingBroly wrote:But the guy who posted that info yesterday just wanted to end speculation that Wii U was weaker than 360/PS3. Although it sounds like someone's current gen engine is having trouble performance wise (I think it's Frostbite 2.0, given Crytek said they're engine was running fine on it and Gearbox has Aliens running on it, which uses Unreal. For those not in the know, Frostbite 2.0 doesn't run so hot on consoles anyway).



MultiCoreInfo.Com wrote:IBM unveiled a 32 nm SOI embedded DRAM, and will provide details at the upcoming IEDM in December. Gary Patton, vice president for IBM’s SRDC, said the SOI eDRAM has latency and cycle times of <2 ns, uses 4× less standby power, and has “up to a 1000x lower soft-error rate (SER), better power savings, and reliability comparable to a similar SRAM.”
IBM Corp.’s Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC, East Fishkill, N.Y.) has fabricated a 16-Mb embedded DRAM (eDRAM) test chip in 32 nm silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology. The eDRAM has a <2 ns access time, and is 4× as dense as “any comparable 32 nm embedded SRAM in the industry,” IBM said.
The eDRAM is fully compatible with logic transistors, with no degradation in logic performance. It incorporates a deep trench capacitor structure, with a high-k dielectric and metal liner capacitor technology. IBM will detail the 32 nm eDRAM at the International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), planned for Dec. 7-9 in Baltimore.

LegendofZelda1996 wrote:A user named Fourth Storm believes that the statement below is referring to the GPU of the Wii U. http://www.neogaf.com/forum/showpost.ph ... ount=12666MultiCoreInfo.Com wrote:IBM unveiled a 32 nm SOI embedded DRAM, and will provide details at the upcoming IEDM in December. Gary Patton, vice president for IBM’s SRDC, said the SOI eDRAM has latency and cycle times of <2 ns, uses 4× less standby power, and has “up to a 1000x lower soft-error rate (SER), better power savings, and reliability comparable to a similar SRAM.”
IBM Corp.’s Semiconductor Research and Development Center (SRDC, East Fishkill, N.Y.) has fabricated a 16-Mb embedded DRAM (eDRAM) test chip in 32 nm silicon-on-insulator (SOI) technology. The eDRAM has a <2 ns access time, and is 4× as dense as “any comparable 32 nm embedded SRAM in the industry,” IBM said.
The eDRAM is fully compatible with logic transistors, with no degradation in logic performance. It incorporates a deep trench capacitor structure, with a high-k dielectric and metal liner capacitor technology. IBM will detail the 32 nm eDRAM at the International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM), planned for Dec. 7-9 in Baltimore.
My guesstimates were in the 1GB, maybe a bit more, range. And it's more than that, for the moment.



Users browsing this forum: beaus27