RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash ...

Get your discussion on with the blog stories. Moderation is less strict, but topics have short lives...quick!

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Sgt Scyther » 26 May 2012 20:15

Fake or not, I hope these characters make it in.
User avatar
Sgt Scyther
Flicky
Flicky
 
Posts: 59
Joined: 08 Nov 2008 02:20
Location: Behind you

RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby Star Luigi » 26 May 2012 20:24

@Iridium077

Actually, Geno was also in a mini-game in Little Fungitown in Mario & Luigi Superstar Saga. ;)
User avatar
Star Luigi
Shyguy
Shyguy
 
Posts: 129
Joined: 24 Jun 2009 00:57

RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby 8bit101 » 26 May 2012 20:26

Fake. It's photoshopped.
8bit101
Shyguy
Shyguy
 
Posts: 102
Joined: 02 Jul 2011 19:43

Re: RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby FatFace83 » 26 May 2012 20:37

ddddd wrote:@funkamatic
What? It would require years to have the basic gameplay alone working flawlessly. There is no chance it would be ready at launch with less characters since the game just started development this year. Besides, less content? Please no.

I agree a lot with you, as much as I cannot wait to get my hands on the next game I want them to take as much time as they can to make a masterpiece, also Nintendo have stated a lot recently that they want to make games that can't be experienced on a smart phone/ pad device so I would imagine these new games will have a lot of content and very special in its own right. I remember the days of waiting 5 years for a new Mario game, a long wait but something was always amazing and different from the last.
User avatar
FatFace83
Shyguy
Shyguy
 
Posts: 103
Joined: 10 Feb 2011 15:00
Location: England
3DS: 0173-1322-7243

RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby NeroSuferoth » 26 May 2012 21:59

At least Geno and Megaman will be in the next game that's for sure.
User avatar
NeroSuferoth
Metool
Metool
 
Posts: 381
Joined: 23 Oct 2008 15:02
XBL: NEROSUFEROTH
PSN: IN__THE___MONEY

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Devil_Rising » 26 May 2012 23:36

How is that for sure? Is this not non-info or a rumor? Or did I miss something?
Image
Also featured at: http://thepunkeffect.com
Follow along on Twitter: @RetroRevelation
User avatar
Devil_Rising
Pokemon Trainer
Pokemon Trainer
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: 27 May 2009 13:03
PSN: AwesomeFukenGuy
NN ID: Godzilla1981

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Mirr0rR3flection » 26 May 2012 23:47

I find it rather sad that I wanted to be excited but then read everyones comments saying it was fake. X'D
※I'll be playing Resident Evil Revelations Wii U on weekends alot so lets play Raid Mode sometime!(ツ) ☆Image
User avatar
Mirr0rR3flection
Plumber
Plumber
 
Posts: 1795
Joined: 25 Mar 2011 01:10
Location: The World Beyond This And That
Wii: 3983-9278-9384-2345
3DS: 1762-2673-3905
NN ID: Mirr0rR3flection

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby NeroSuferoth » 27 May 2012 00:34

Devil_Rising wrote:How is that for sure? Is this not non-info or a rumor? Or did I miss something?


It was more wishful thinking than anything, but given how the series sees more new characters with every new entry and seeing as it appears non-Nintendo characters such as Snake and Sonic were introduced in Brawl, I think it's something they will keep on doing for future Smash games... So Geno and Megaman seem more likelly to me since fans keep asking for them (myself included).
User avatar
NeroSuferoth
Metool
Metool
 
Posts: 381
Joined: 23 Oct 2008 15:02
XBL: NEROSUFEROTH
PSN: IN__THE___MONEY

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Devil_Rising » 27 May 2012 01:46

If that's the case, I hope they leave Snake out this time. He played like crap and he just doesn't fit the universe. Mega Man the CLASSIC Mega Man, I'm fine with, because he is deeply tied to Nintendo's past. I still would rather they included Simon Belmont, who was included in no less than 4 different Nintendo based CV games. I think he would work better, have cooler moves, and the background/soundtrack they could have for his stage could be amazing.
Image
Also featured at: http://thepunkeffect.com
Follow along on Twitter: @RetroRevelation
User avatar
Devil_Rising
Pokemon Trainer
Pokemon Trainer
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: 27 May 2009 13:03
PSN: AwesomeFukenGuy
NN ID: Godzilla1981

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby hawthorneluke » 27 May 2012 04:18

Apart from it being photoshopped or whatever, it's also most probably fake judging from the language.

This Chris person machine translated his message from English to Japanese, but he said he did that originally anyway, so that's all OK. It's a long message, so it's very easy to tell that it's machine translated (because of how incorrect it is in places).

But then there's Sakurai's response, which isn't incorrect Japanese or anything, so it doesn't stand out as a machine translation right away, but it does stand out a bit as an odd response. Doesn't really seem like it'd be a response from Sakurai comparing it to his other posts.

Now, if we google translate "2 out of 3" into Japanese, we get that exact same reply that Sakurai said, most probably meaning that indeed, Chris also machine translated Sakurai's response, which would explain why it doesn't feel like it's coming from Sakurai and that Chris did indeed fabricate the whole thing.
hawthorneluke
Fairy
Fairy
 
Posts: 4
Joined: 10 Jun 2011 08:40

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Kazin » 27 May 2012 06:41

All of the hype behind Geno is the fact that a ton of people that have the money to purchase a 3DS and a Wii U played Super Mario RPG as a kid back when the Famicom/SNES was making its rounds. I remember it pretty vividly as a kid. Geno (and Mallow) were both pretty cool characters by definition, and that nostalgia, like many games, characters and settings, carries on even today, decades after release.

I mean, look at games like Star Tropics. People want Mike Jones in and Star Tropics was, in comparison to a game like Super Mario RPG, not nearly as memorable. A lot of franchises and characters run purely on nostalgia power. It's why people still purchase Mario, Sonic and Metal Gear games. Everyone nostalgic for the characters and settings, everyone hoping that the next game won't disappoint.

Anyway, having said that, I honestly want Geno in for the very reasons I've stated above: nostalgia. When I play fighting games, I tend to play and main characters that I like, and Geno would be right there with Ness, Lucas and Ganondorf. I think there might be some validity to this claim, because wasn't there a news story floating around some time ago that Squenix had let Nintendo borrow 'older' characters for a project? That either means another crappy Fortune Street/Itadaki Street game, or..

Geno and Mallow for Smash 4. Day One Purchase. :3
User avatar
Kazin
Waddle Dee
Waddle Dee
 
Posts: 86
Joined: 31 Dec 2011 00:18

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Radiant » 27 May 2012 08:19

I don't believe this.

However, I do think that Isaac better be playable in SSB4.
Image
User avatar
Radiant
Shyguy
Shyguy
 
Posts: 118
Joined: 30 Jul 2011 22:24
Wii: 1924-2316-9778-0248
PSN: Bassoonist26

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Devil_Rising » 27 May 2012 08:40

Kazin wrote:All of the hype behind Geno is the fact that a ton of people that have the money to purchase a 3DS and a Wii U played Super Mario RPG as a kid back when the Famicom/SNES was making its rounds. I remember it pretty vividly as a kid. Geno (and Mallow) were both pretty cool characters by definition, and that nostalgia, like many games, characters and settings, carries on even today, decades after release.

I mean, look at games like Star Tropics. People want Mike Jones in and Star Tropics was, in comparison to a game like Super Mario RPG, not nearly as memorable. A lot of franchises and characters run purely on nostalgia power. It's why people still purchase Mario, Sonic and Metal Gear games. Everyone nostalgic for the characters and settings, everyone hoping that the next game won't disappoint.

Anyway, having said that, I honestly want Geno in for the very reasons I've stated above: nostalgia. When I play fighting games, I tend to play and main characters that I like, and Geno would be right there with Ness, Lucas and Ganondorf. I think there might be some validity to this claim, because wasn't there a news story floating around some time ago that Squenix had let Nintendo borrow 'older' characters for a project? That either means another crappy Fortune Street/Itadaki Street game, or..

Geno and Mallow for Smash 4. Day One Purchase. :3



Well, if you want to get technical.........

It all depends on who you ask. Star Tropics "not being nearly as memorable" is entirely a matter of opinion. To you, who "grew up" playing Mario RPG, Geno is super memorable. To someone like me, who "grew up" playing Star Tropics 1 & 2, those games are absolutely more memorable, and I would imagine others my age who "grew up" with the NES, not so much the SNES, would agree. Mind you, I played (and quite liked) Super Mario RPG. I even liked the character of Gino. I merely stated that I don't see why some people are SO obsessed with the character, when to me, he wasn't even the coolest character in the game (personally, I was more stoked to be able to actually play Bowser).

Beyond that, wouldn't Nintendo own the rights to Gino and Mallow, the same as they own the rights to Diddy, and Funky, and Cranky Kong, etc.? The only reason they don't own characters like Banjo and Conquer and Joanna Dark, is because Rare published those titles themselves. Nintendo published Donkey Kong Country and Super Mario RPG themselves, meaning any new characters created by Rare or Square in those games, still belong to Nintendo. Meaning they could use Gino and Mallow any time they want, I'd think.

I would love Mike Jones to be in Smash Bros., and I think he belongs there. I don't think that has as much to do with my "nostalgia", as it does with the fact that the Star Tropics games were truly excellent, with a great story and classic (but hard) gameplay. ST is a franchise they really need to bring back (ala Kid Icarus, which also only received two entries and was then "forgotten"). I grew up genuinely loving those games, and I think Mike, with his Yoyo/Morningstar weapon could have some really unique/cool moves. On a similar note, I think they really messed up not making Little Mac a playable character in Brawl. He's from a fighting game already, for christ's sake, and his move set would have been perfect.

As for nostalgia being behind people buying Mario, Sonic and Metal Gear...while I can certainly see your point with Sonic and Metal Gear (one of which hasn't been good since it's 2D days and the other of which I was just never into in the first place), I really cannot say the same is true at all for Mario. The ONLY Mario titles I personally have been let down by in the entire series, were Sunshine and Galaxy 2. Sunshine because the setting was repetitive and uninspiring to me, and I just really didn't need to play Mario with a water pack (consequently, that theme and setting would have worked a lot better for a non-Mario game). And Galaxy 2, because it was (to me) flat out unnecessary, and more or less the "Lost Levels" of Mario Galaxy, just a game with harder, unused level ideas. And Yoshi, who didn't really work the way he was supposed to in 3D.

But otherwise, Super Mario Galaxy, New Super Mario Bros. Wii, even Super Paper Mario? I was thrilled with those games, which were really high quality, as most of the Mario adventure games tend to continue to be.



I see your points, and they were fairly valid ones. But I just thought I'd throw in my 15 cents. :mrgreen:
Image
Also featured at: http://thepunkeffect.com
Follow along on Twitter: @RetroRevelation
User avatar
Devil_Rising
Pokemon Trainer
Pokemon Trainer
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: 27 May 2009 13:03
PSN: AwesomeFukenGuy
NN ID: Godzilla1981

RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby WarioT » 27 May 2012 09:15

Oh man they shouldn't tease like this
User avatar
WarioT
Waddle Dee
Waddle Dee
 
Posts: 97
Joined: 19 Apr 2012 08:50
Location: Philippines
3DS: 5284-2261-4149

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Muigi » 27 May 2012 09:16

I played the crap out of Super Mario RPG as a kid, and I STILL don't get the Geno hype. He's a wooden doll that comes to life via a child's wish. He kinda just came out of nowhere, really. It's hard to fangasm over something that has barely any screentime or backstory, in my opinion.

Besides, Mario, Peach, and Bowser should always be your main team in that game no matter what. You'll tear the game a new one that way.
[Of course, it's always a good idea to keep everyone at the same level.]

Devil_Rising wrote:Beyond that, wouldn't Nintendo own the rights to Geno and Mallow, the same as they own the rights to Diddy, and Funky, and Cranky Kong, etc.? The only reason they don't own characters like Banjo and Conquer and Joanna Dark, is because Rare published those titles themselves. Nintendo published Donkey Kong Country and Super Mario RPG themselves, meaning any new characters created by Rare or Square in those games, still belong to Nintendo. Meaning they could use Geno and Mallow any time they want, I'd think.

Actually, I believe it's the polar opposite in this case. Geno and Mallow were made up by Square Enix themselves, if memory serves me correctly. Therefore, they are [partially] owned by Square Enix, not Nintendo. Heck, Nintendo had to give credit to Square Enix just to use the Geno cameo in Mario & Luigi: Superstar Saga.
User avatar
Muigi
Shyguy
Shyguy
 
Posts: 103
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 18:24
Location: I may even be behind you. o.o
XBL: Muigi01

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Devil_Rising » 27 May 2012 09:22

Interesting. Especially considering Rare also made characters like Diddy and the rest of the Kong bunch themselves too. Nintendo absolutely owns the entire cast of Rare-created Donkey Kong titles. But I guess they had to make concessions to Square just to get SMRPG made? *shrugs*
Image
Also featured at: http://thepunkeffect.com
Follow along on Twitter: @RetroRevelation
User avatar
Devil_Rising
Pokemon Trainer
Pokemon Trainer
 
Posts: 1202
Joined: 27 May 2009 13:03
PSN: AwesomeFukenGuy
NN ID: Godzilla1981

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Muigi » 27 May 2012 09:29

Devil_Rising wrote:But I guess they had to make concessions to Square just to get SMRPG made? *shrugs*

Can't tell ya on that one, I have no idea either. But that's what it seems to be.

So going by that logic, Geno would be considered either a 2nd party character or a full-on 3rd party entry I think. On the downside to this, that'd be yet another Mario character entry into the roster. We have the main 4 already, we don't need any more. Same with the Zelda and Pokemon series.
I say to keep the franchise entries to a max of 4 fighters, personally. Makes the roster seem more balanced out with even representation that way.
User avatar
Muigi
Shyguy
Shyguy
 
Posts: 103
Joined: 08 Oct 2009 18:24
Location: I may even be behind you. o.o
XBL: Muigi01

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby Radiant » 27 May 2012 11:44

Muigi wrote:
Devil_Rising wrote:But I guess they had to make concessions to Square just to get SMRPG made? *shrugs*

Can't tell ya on that one, I have no idea either. But that's what it seems to be.

So going by that logic, Geno would be considered either a 2nd party character or a full-on 3rd party entry I think. On the downside to this, that'd be yet another Mario character entry into the roster. We have the main 4 already, we don't need any more. Same with the Zelda and Pokemon series.
I say to keep the franchise entries to a max of 4 fighters, personally. Makes the roster seem more balanced out with even representation that way.


On the contrary, I think there should be more Mario characters.

But not Geno. Geno is one of the most irrelevant Mario characters they could possibly pick, and the trouble they'd have to go through to get the licensing to add him? Just isn't worth it no matter which way you cut it.

I'm not saying I dislike Geno, but there was way too much hype for Geno in Brawl. He never had even the slightest bit of a chance.

Anyway, more Mario characters because the roster going to expand quite a bit further, right? It's true that Zelda has reached its max point of necessary characters. But really only because of the nature of the series and how there aren't any other characters that aren't one-shots or... well, Tingle. We won't go into that.

As much as I hate it, Bowser Jr. deserves a spot.
Image
User avatar
Radiant
Shyguy
Shyguy
 
Posts: 118
Joined: 30 Jul 2011 22:24
Wii: 1924-2316-9778-0248
PSN: Bassoonist26

Re: RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby TUMF » 27 May 2012 16:44

Iridium077 wrote:
Chosenoneknuckles wrote:
Eliskor wrote:More Mario before any other newcomer IMO.


Fix'd, and amen. 8)

Re-fix'd for greater accuracy.

Perfected. :pbj:
ImageImage (Σ(:o}D
User avatar
TUMF
Waddle Dee
Waddle Dee
 
Posts: 76
Joined: 24 Feb 2011 20:20

Re: RUMOR - Sakurai teases Isaac, Mega Man or Geno for Smash

Postby MasterofMonster » 27 May 2012 16:55

I'd say that, or the Mario characters, Rosalina, Bowser Jr, Birdo, and Daisy are the ones with the biggest chance.

And I'd love LOVE to see Wart in!
Image
User avatar
MasterofMonster
Metool
Metool
 
Posts: 348
Joined: 09 Jan 2011 15:44
Location: Sweden

RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby Crow » 28 May 2012 08:30

Geno...please explain this to me

Do you people also want to see byrne?
I dont care if you think a character is cool, it doesnt mean hes fit to be in a fighter. Its one thing if he were an assist, but people have been whining over geno being a fighter since melee.
How about instead of wanting them to waste time and resources on a character a splinter of the fanbase actually cares about, you beg the devs to make existing characters more unique?
User avatar
Crow
Chocobo
Chocobo
 
Posts: 38
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 10:56

RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby HammerGalladeBro » 28 May 2012 18:52

Yeah, I still don't get why people insist on Geno, I would better argue for characters like Lip, Little Mac, Prince Fluff (being serious) and Ghirahim.
Last edited by HammerGalladeBro on 28 May 2012 19:46, edited 1 time in total.
Image
Image
User avatar
HammerGalladeBro
Koopa Troopa
Koopa Troopa
 
Posts: 412
Joined: 27 Apr 2012 18:46
Location: Saltillo, Coah, Mexico
Wii: 2969 2823 0139 0622

Re: RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby Chosenoneknuckles » 28 May 2012 19:06

HammerGalladeBro wrote:Yeah, I still don't get why people insist on Geno, I would better argue for characters like Lip, Little Mac, Prince Fluff (being serious) and Ghirahim.


I'll give you Lip and Ghirahim.
User avatar
Chosenoneknuckles
Koopa Troopa
Koopa Troopa
 
Posts: 417
Joined: 08 Nov 2008 07:50
Location: UK
3DS: 1590-4669-5649
NN ID: Chosenoneknux

RUMOR - Smash Bros. rumor most likely fake

Postby Crow » 28 May 2012 19:37

@HammerGalladeBro
Huh...Smash bros doesnt have a creep character yet, does it?
Doubt ghirahim whould work though, hed just be a reskin of marth or some crap like that.
I dont see what you would get out of little mac, but at least hed force the devs to create a unique character.

Seperate ganondorf further from falcon, and allow us to pick sheik as her own fighter, those seem more important than adding more freaking characters.
User avatar
Crow
Chocobo
Chocobo
 
Posts: 38
Joined: 22 Dec 2010 10:56

Previous

Return to GoNintendo Blog Story Discussion

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Zack