Advertisements
Player Select
User Reviews
November 2, 2009 by RawmeatCowboy
Filed Under: Wii
Graphics are pretty nice, but I think it has a lot to do with the lower rendering quality that happens after YouTube. Thanks to Terranigma_Freak for the heads up!
Story Feedback
November 2, 2009 at 1:34 pm
Wii FPS of the year.
The textures are bad, but look at the raptor models and compare it to the 360 footage we just saw. For a 39.99 shovelware, this looks pretty good. I'm willing to bet this looks better than COD4MW.
The textures are bad, but look at the raptor models and compare it to the 360 footage we just saw. For a 39.99 shovelware, this looks pretty good. I'm willing to bet this looks better than COD4MW.
November 2, 2009 at 1:34 pm
I saw up until he got attacked when he picked up the pistol.
No waggle? No waggle? Holy crap.
Just mash A in?
;_____;
TOOK 3 YEARS for devs to get the waggle out of their system, thank the lord.
No waggle? No waggle? Holy crap.
Just mash A in?
;_____;
TOOK 3 YEARS for devs to get the waggle out of their system, thank the lord.
November 2, 2009 at 1:34 pm
That actually was a pretty fun looking dino that jumped out at him... this might be worth a rent for some laughs and fun. I just feel bad about shooting dinos, even angry bloodthirsty ones.
They are like the ultimate endangered animal, if any are out there!
lol
They are like the ultimate endangered animal, if any are out there!
lol
November 2, 2009 at 1:49 pm
@MrBubbles
Yes, because motion controls in a console meant for them is a bad thing.
Why do you even own a Wii, if I may ask?
Yes, because motion controls in a console meant for them is a bad thing.
Why do you even own a Wii, if I may ask?
November 2, 2009 at 2:04 pm
@Inneverate
Waggle is pointless and more work than a button press, it only adds to a game in very rare cases and this is not it.
-
This game doesn't look very good at all really, it is clearly a PS2 game. That said, we have all seen worse on the Wii and there may be a little potential.
Also, Dinos!
Waggle is pointless and more work than a button press, it only adds to a game in very rare cases and this is not it.
-
This game doesn't look very good at all really, it is clearly a PS2 game. That said, we have all seen worse on the Wii and there may be a little potential.
Also, Dinos!
November 2, 2009 at 2:04 pm
Even though I know it's something that's just...popped up out of nowhere, and really no independent press(like, aside from press release statements) about the game, I stilllll kind of want to know what it's like, how it plays, etc.
I don't know. I guess I really miss games like Carnivores 1 and 2. And Trespasser, almost best box stacking simulator ever. (Still have it, but WinXP is kind of awkward with it, even with the patches and junk.)
Compared to those games, it really looks just fine. I think the rediculous back story and dialogue is a little too much though. Drop me on an island so I can shoot dinosaurs - I don't really need a whole lot of story for that.
Egh. Unless it's Youtube, the framerate looks a little chuggy. Not going to help with IR aiming. I'd stick a 30 dollar price tag on this if it were a full Turok or Trespasser sized game. I just get the feeling it's a barely five level deal with mediocre 'we are stranded on dino island oh noes' dialogue, etc. Feh.
I don't know. I guess I really miss games like Carnivores 1 and 2. And Trespasser, almost best box stacking simulator ever. (Still have it, but WinXP is kind of awkward with it, even with the patches and junk.)
Compared to those games, it really looks just fine. I think the rediculous back story and dialogue is a little too much though. Drop me on an island so I can shoot dinosaurs - I don't really need a whole lot of story for that.
Egh. Unless it's Youtube, the framerate looks a little chuggy. Not going to help with IR aiming. I'd stick a 30 dollar price tag on this if it were a full Turok or Trespasser sized game. I just get the feeling it's a barely five level deal with mediocre 'we are stranded on dino island oh noes' dialogue, etc. Feh.
November 2, 2009 at 2:18 pm
it honestly doesn't look too bad, the blurriness is from the video. Even the words are blurry.
November 2, 2009 at 2:25 pm
if i wanted full HD quality and grasses swaying in the breeze, i'd go the hell outside! but i guess ppl cry about rocks looking like rocks out there too... i like to know im still playing a game, and that it is fun.
November 2, 2009 at 2:29 pm
@Scherzo
Yep depending upon the amount of quality lost due to the method of capturing the footage plus the automatic 50% loss that youtube has it looks fairly decent for a unknown heard of developers game.
Yep depending upon the amount of quality lost due to the method of capturing the footage plus the automatic 50% loss that youtube has it looks fairly decent for a unknown heard of developers game.
November 2, 2009 at 2:30 pm
@Dr_Peace
Depends like you said Resident Evil 4 it was a lot more easy then a bunch of button mashes that require a turbo function to accomplish.
Depends like you said Resident Evil 4 it was a lot more easy then a bunch of button mashes that require a turbo function to accomplish.
November 2, 2009 at 2:41 pm
I hate button presses. Just today in Disaster:Day of Crisis I was getting annoyed how they put in button mashing instead of some kind of more fitting motion control. Hell, give me waggle instead, I can do that much easier and faster than those button presses that need to be done in a way only someone who trained that stuff since the NES days can do it.
November 2, 2009 at 2:52 pm
looks pretty good, WOndering about multiplayer though, both local and online.
Although water does look really bad.
Although water does look really bad.
November 2, 2009 at 3:15 pm
Honestly doesn't look too bad. Wii controls seem competent.
-----
Share your opinion on this and other subjects, on the GoNintendo Message Boards.
-----
Share your opinion on this and other subjects, on the GoNintendo Message Boards.
November 2, 2009 at 3:55 pm
That doesn't look terrible. The character model animations are awful, but they were that way in the 360 version, too. Overall, I'd say it actually looks good.
Why is the dialogue different from the 360 to the Wii version though?
Why is the dialogue different from the 360 to the Wii version though?
November 2, 2009 at 3:59 pm
Its seems like they did a pretty good job downgrading the textures evenly across the entire environment. I mean that in a good way, because the instead of taking away objects, they seems to have most all of the foliage intact. The dinosaurs do not have shadowing, and the water does not have that subtle ripple effect from the X360 version (the water looks like crap in the X360 as well).
The way the cursor gets bigger when you move it to the edges, is actually very interesting.
It sucks that they removed the "what the foxtrot?!" line.
The way the cursor gets bigger when you move it to the edges, is actually very interesting.
It sucks that they removed the "what the foxtrot?!" line.
November 2, 2009 at 4:24 pm
Contact to this company who make this and bring it back to drawing board and do it again.. No wind or waggle or anything. Its crap! I want to play this game because I love jurassic park shooter and its a little bit disappointment.
November 2, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Why did they make it so dark. I dont care if its not as good looking i just want to see whats going on.
Please log in using your message board account to post feeback.
Don't have an account? Click here to register!
Don't have an account? Click here to register!


more













This Wii footage looks awful. Wii deserve better than this. Stop supporting devs that crap out this vomit.
*EDIT*
Since it's available for PS2, I am pretty sure that for the PS2/Wii versions, the lead development code is the PS2.