Pach-Attack - G4

Dec 29, 2012 by RawmeatCowboy

Categories: Media, Interviews | Tags: Pachter | Rating:

-5

Also check out:

7 total comments (View all) 7 most recent shown:

MatthewB92

29 Dec 2012 21:09

@User | Reply | Report

He said it because of the store not that it's hard to develop for.

komicturtle92

29 Dec 2012 21:13

@User | Reply | Report

I don't think GTTV is doing better than G4. GT was actually good until Geoff came in and Spike TV made it into some program on their network. GTTV and G4 appeal to the same demographic and share folks who generally don't know what they're talking about..

Electrofreq

29 Dec 2012 22:03

@User | Reply | Report

This man says some strange stuff.

Mike_Intellivision

29 Dec 2012 22:18

@User | Reply | Report

What I wonder about is how Wedbush can condone the public, off hours activities of Pachter.

In other words, he makes such a "name" for himself in the field that he is supposed to be analyzing, can he really do objective analysis for his clients?

Mike from Morgantown

Entity

30 Dec 2012 00:07

@User | Reply | Report

He is so drunk!

marsbarrow

30 Dec 2012 02:02

@User | Reply | Report

Pachter seems off (again) on some points. G4 was in trouble before Adam Sessler left. I agree that Adam is a pretty smart guy (at times), but he did not make that channel. Kevin left and Adam left and their replacements were subpar, but they probably lost those guys because the channel was in trouble irregardless. TechTV was were it was at, but because corporate bigwigs weren't able to make tons of money running that, and the buyer, G4, they decided to change programming multiple times, and now just rename it altogether. Pachter fails again, especially since he didn't understand the whole Windows fiasco either. And, this guy is supposed to be someone we can look to for investor advice in the gamespace? Sad, really.